4.7 Article

Petrov-Galerkin flux upwinding for mixed mimetic spectral elements, and its application to geophysical flow problems

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2021.02.017

关键词

Advection; Upwinding; Mimetic; Compatible; Mixed finite elements

资金

  1. CSIRO IMT Scientific Computing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upwinded mass fluxes are used for advection operators discretised using mixed mimetic spectral elements. This method improves accuracy by adding dissipation biased toward high wave numbers, removes spectral gaps in the dispersion relation, and achieves energy conservation through skew-symmetric formulations.
Upwinded mass fluxes are described and analysed for advection operators discretised using mixed mimetic spectral elements. This involves a Petrov-Galerkin formulation by which the mass flux test functions are evaluated at downstream locations along velocity characteristics. As for the original mixed mimetic spectral element advection operator, the upwinded mass flux advection operator is conservative, however unlike the original advection operator, which is purely hyperbolic, the upwinded advection operator adds dissipation which is biased towards high wave numbers. The upwinded advection operator also removes the spectral gaps present in the dispersion relation for the original advection operator. As for the original advection operator, a material form advection operator may be constructed by similarly downwinding the trial functions of the tracer gradients. Both methods allow for the recovery of exact energy conservation for an incompressible flow field via skew-symmetric formulations. However these skew-symmetric formulations are once again purely hyperbolic operators which do not suppress oscillations. The scheme is implemented within a shallow water code on the sphere in order to diagnose and interpolate the potential vorticity. In the absence of other dissipation terms, it is shown to yield more coherent results for a standard test case of barotropic instability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据