4.5 Article

Machine learning-based accelerated property prediction of two-phase materials using microstructural descriptors and finite element analysis

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110328

关键词

Machine learning; Microstructure; Two-phase materials; Finite element analysis; Two-point correlation; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CMMI: 1727445]
  2. Dean's Fellowship from Arizona State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the use of supervised machine learning to predict the mechanical properties of a family of two-phase materials based on microstructural images, successfully demonstrating the accuracy of ML methods in predicting homogenized elastic properties and identifying key points related to microstructural features.
This study explores the use of supervised machine learning (ML) to predict the mechanical properties of a family of two-phase materials using their microstructural images. Random two-phase microstructures with a diversity of inclusion volume fractions, size distributions, and/or shapes are input into a finite element analysis program to determine the elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, and phase stresses. The finite element analysis results establish the ground truth to train the supervised ML models. Two-point correlation (TPC) functions and principal component (PC) analysis are applied to the microstructures before training and testing the artificial neural network (ANN) and forest ensemble MLs. The chosen ML methods are found to accurately predict the homogenized elastic properties. Although the PCs for each set of microstructures are unique, recognizable patterns are detected that signify microstructural features that are key to microstructure-based property prediction. This work enables the development of ML algorithms to predict the mechanical properties of complex, multi-phase microstructural composites, based on microstructural images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据