4.7 Article

Free vibration and buckling of bidirectional functionally graded sandwich beams using an enriched third-order shear deformation beam element

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113309

关键词

BFGSW beam; Third-order shear deformation theory; Vibration and buckling analysis; Hierarchic enrichment; Beam element

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [107.02-2018.23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an efficient beam element model for free vibration and buckling analysis of bidirectional functionally graded sandwich beams. By analyzing the natural frequencies and buckling loads of beams under different boundary conditions, the effects of material distribution and layer thickness on vibration and buckling characteristics are investigated.
This paper formulates an efficient third-order shear deformation beam element for free vibration and buckling analysis of bidirectional functionally graded sandwich (BFGSW) beams. The beams consist of three layers, an axially functionally graded core and two face sheets with material properties varying in both the thickness and length directions by power-law distributions. The element is derived in this paper for the first time by using hierarchical functions to enrich the Lagrange and Hermite interpolations of a conventional beam element, and this enrichment results in a super convergent beam element. Using the formulated beam element, natural frequencies and buckling loads are evaluated for the beams with various boundary conditions. The effects of the material distribution and the layer thickness on the vibration and buckling characteristics are examined in detail and highlighted. The influence of the micromechanical models, namely the Voigt model and Mori-Tanaka scheme used in estimating the effective material properties, on the vibration frequencies and buckling loads of the beams is also examined and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据