4.6 Article

Effect of pillared surfaces with different shape parameters on droplet wettability via Lattice Boltzmann method

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126259

关键词

Lattice Boltzmann method; Two-phase flow; High density ratio; Water droplet; Wettability; Contact angle

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2019006-3]
  2. Jiangsu Postgraduate Research Innovation Program [KYCX20_3024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the influences of different pillar shape parameters on water droplet wettability, using a two-dimensional pseudopotential model with lattice Boltzmann method. The results show that pillar height, width, and spacing affect droplet wettability and conversion, and vortices are generated when the droplet contacts the surface.
In this study, to explore the influences of different pillar shape parameters on the wettability of a water droplet, a two-dimensional pseudopotential model at a large density ratio was established to predict the wettability of a pillared wall microstructure via lattice Boltzmann method. The improved force term and tunable surface tension term were implemented in the model. The formation of vortex was studied during droplet contacts the surface. The influences of different pillar heights, widths, and spacings on the wettability and wettability conversion of droplets were investigated. The results reveal that the vortexes will be generated during droplet contacts the surface. The pillars can hold up droplets, thereby greatly increasing the droplet contact angle. With the increase of the pillar height, the droplet gradually shifts from filling the convex gap to being held up by the air in the gap. The pillar width mainly determines contact angle. Moreover, the contact angle decreases with the increase of the pillar spacing. However, when the pillar spacing is large enough, the droplet can enter the gap closest to the droplet. As roughness increases, the water droplet is converted from Wenzel state to Cassie state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据