4.7 Review

Invasive fungal disease and the immunocompromised host including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Improved understanding and new strategic approach with sargramostim

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108731

关键词

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating; factor; Hematopoietic cell transplantation; Sargramostim; Colony-stimulating factor; Mycoses; Invasive fungal infections

资金

  1. Partner Therapeutics, Inc., Lexington, MA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breakthrough fungal infections can be fatal in hosts with impaired immune systems, such as those undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant or intensive chemotherapy. Risk factors include severe neutropenia and corticosteroid use. An individual's level of immunosuppression directly affects infection risk, with early intervention potentially improving outcomes.
In hosts with damaged or impaired immune systems such as those undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or intensive chemotherapy, breakthrough fungal infections can be fatal. Risk factors for breakthrough infections include severe neutropenia, use of corticosteroids, extended use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and intensive care unit admission. An individual's cumulative state of immunosuppression directly contributes to the likelihood of experiencing increased infection risk. Incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) after HCT may be up to 5-8%. Early intervention may improve IFI outcomes, although many infections are resistant to standard therapies (voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B, posaconazole or itraconazole, as single agents or in combination). We review herein several contributing factors that may contribute to the net state of immunosuppression in recipients of HCT. We also review a new approach for IFI utilizing adjunctive therapy with sargramostim, a yeast-derived recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据