4.7 Article

Relationship Between Gastric Emptying Rate and Simultaneously Assessed Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 E429-E437

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.03.023

关键词

Gastroparesis; Functional Dyspepsia; Gastric Emptying Test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the severity of symptoms in functional dyspepsia and idiopathic gastroparesis is not correlated to gastric emptying rate. Patients with delayed gastric emptying had higher overall meal-related symptom severity, particularly in terms of nausea.
METHODS: During a GE test (breath test with C-13-octanoic acid labelled 250 kcal solid meal), the severity of 6 symptoms (postprandial fullness, epigastric pain and burning, bloating, nausea and belching) was assessed, every 15 min, before meal-intake and 4h postprandially. The sum of individual symptom scores generated the meal-related symptoms score; the sum of all symptoms generated overall meal-related symptom severity (OSS). Data were compared in patients with normal and delayed GE (cut-off T-1/2 >= 109 min). Data are shown as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: 504 patients were included, of which 382 patients (67% female, age 43.8 +/- 0.8 years, BMI 23.3 +/- 0.2 kg/m(2)) had normal and 122 patients (77% female, age 42.7 +/- 1.5 years, BMI 23.2 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) had delayed GE. OSS tended to be higher in patients with delayed GE (81.8 +/- 3.4 vs. 99.5 +/- 7.1, p = .05). Only nausea was significantly higher in patients with delayed GE (11 +/- 0.8 vs. 16 +/- 1.6, p = .01). No correlations were observed between GE rate and any of the symptoms (OSS: r =0.06, p = .2; nausea: r =0.06, p = .1). The symptom severity time course showed a significant difference only for nausea, with increased severity ratings 90 min after the meal (p<.01) in delayed GE compared to normal GE patients. CONCLUSION: The severity of symptoms in functional dyspepsia and idiopathic gastroparesis, even when assessed during the GE test meal, is not correlated to gastric emptying rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据