4.6 Article

Resistivity superconducting transition in single-crystalline Cd0.95Ni0.05Sb system consisting of non-superconducting CdSb and NiSb phases

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 223-228

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.05.004

关键词

Two-component CdSb-NiSb system; Inhomogeneous conducting systems; Electrical properties; Superconductivity; Hopping conductivity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [0851-2020-0035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resistivity superconducting transition has been observed in a two-component system, with superconductivity being affected by magnetic fields, exhibiting a broad width and being related to the inhomogeneity of the single crystal studied.
Resistivity superconducting transition has been for the first time found in single crystal of twocomponent 0.95(CdSb)-0.05(NiSb) system. End members of the system are not superconductors under normal conditions. Insulating behavior in temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity, which is due to hopping conductivity, precedes the transition. The resistivity superconducting transition is rather broad, since at cooling down the electrical resistivity starts to fall at 10.5 K, whereas zero resistivity is reached only at similar to 2.3 K. Longitudinal magnetic field gradually depresses superconductivity and shifts the superconducting transition to lower temperatures. Under magnetic field above 0.5 T, superconductivity is totally destroyed. Main features observed in the resistivity superconducting transition, including its unusually big width and insulating electrical behavior above the transition, can be related to inhomogeneity of the single crystal studied. According to XRD and SEM examinations, the single crystal consists of major CdSb phase and minor NiSb phase. The NiSb phase forms inhomogeneities in the CdSb matrix. Micro-sized needle-like NiSb crystals and nano-sized Ni1-xSbx clusters can be considered as typical inhomogeneities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据