4.5 Article

Low-Frequency Magnetic Stimulation of Shenmen Acupoint Reduces Blood Oxygen Levels in the Prefrontal Cortex of Healthy Subjects: A Near-Infrared Brain Functional Imaging Study

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 585-588

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-021-3291-z

关键词

Shenmen acupoint; transcranial magnetic stimulation; functional near-infrared spectroscopy; prefrontal lobe; healthy subjects

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873354]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province [2018ZDXM-SF-013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of low-frequency magnetic stimulation at Shenmen (HT 7) acupoint on blood oxygen levels in the prefrontal cortex of healthy subjects using fNIRS technology. The results showed a decrease in blood oxygen concentration during the stimulation period, with significant differences observed in the recovery period.
Objective To explore the effect of low-frequency magnetic stimulation at Shenmen (HT 7) acupoint on blood oxygen levels in the prefrontal cortex of healthy subjects. Methods Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) technology was used to collect real-time data of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) in the prefrontal cortex of 16 healthy subjects at resting state and low-frequency magnetic stimulation of Shenmen. The mean and integral values of blood oxygen concentration were analyzed. Results Compared with the resting state, the mean and integral values of blood oxygen concentration were decreased during the task period, recovery period, and the whole process in the magnetic stimulation of Shenmen acupoint (P<0.05). In particular, the difference was statistically significant in the recovery period (P<0.01). Conclusions The prefrontal cortex was widely activated and produced an immediate effect by reducing the local blood oxygen concentration at low-frequency magnetic stimulation of Shenmen acupoint, which verifies the sedative effect of Shenmen acupoint.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据