4.8 Review

Defect Engineering of Photocatalysts towards Elevated CO2 Reduction Performance

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 13, 页码 2635-2654

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202100677

关键词

CO2 valorization; defect engineering; doping; photocatalysis; vacancies

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0127400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872317, 21835007]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai [20520711900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defect engineering is an effective strategy to enhance photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. By generating defects mainly in the form of vacancies and dopants, it can modulate the electronic structure and light absorption properties of photocatalysts, increasing surface active sites for CO2 activation and conversion. This approach can improve the CO2 reduction performance of photocatalysts in terms of activity, selectivity, and stability.
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction provides a promising solution to address the crises of massive CO2 emissions and fossil energy shortages. As one of the most effective strategies to promote CO2 photoconversion, defect engineering shows great potential in modulating the electronic structure and light absorption properties of photocatalysts while increasing surface active sites for CO2 activation and conversion. This Review summarizes the recent progress in defect engineering of photocatalysts to promote CO2 reduction performances from the following four aspects: 1) Approaches to defect (mainly vacancy and dopant) generation in photocatalysts; 2) defect structure characterization techniques; 3) physical and chemical properties of defect-engineered photocatalysts; 4) CO2 reduction performance enhancements in activity, selectivity, and stability of photocatalysts by defect engineering. This Review is expected to present readers with a comprehensive view of progress in the field of photocatalytic CO2 reduction through defect engineering for elevated CO2-to-fuels conversion efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据