4.7 Article

Response and capability of Scirpus mucronatus (L.) in phytotreating petrol- contaminated soil

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128760

关键词

Phytoremediation; Petrol; Scirpus mucronatus; TPH; Contaminated soil; SEM-EDX

资金

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) [DIP-2019-017]
  2. Tasik Chini Research Centre, UKM [DIP-2019-017]
  3. Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research demonstrates that Scirpus mucronatus (L.) has a high potential in removing petrol from contaminated soil, with an average Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) removal of 82.1% in 10 g/kg petrol-contaminated soil. Additionally, petrol has a positive impact on plant growth, as shown by the increase in dry and wet weights throughout the study period.
The greenhouse phytotoxicity experiment was conducted to analyse and assess the capability of Scirpus mucronatus (L.) in tolerating and removing petrol in contaminated soil. This research was conducted for 72 days by using 5, 10 and 30 g/kg petrol as soil contaminants. Results showed that the system planted with S. mucronatus (L.) had high potential to treat the 10 g/kg petrol-contaminated soil and had an average Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) removal of 82.1%. At 5 and 30 g/kg petrol, the planted system removed 74.9% and 75.8% TPH, respectively. The petrol (10 g/kg) affected the plant growth positively, which was indicated by the increase in dry and wet weights throughout the research period. The removal of the TPH in the system was performed because of the interaction of plants and rhizobacteria. SEM showed that a high concentration of petrol (30 g/kg) affected the plant tissue negatively, as indicated by the altered structures of the root and stem cells. EDX results also confirmed that petrol was absorbed by the plant, as shown by the increased carbon content in the plant's root and stem after the treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据