4.6 Article

Structure-Activity Relationship for Di- up to Tetranuclear Macrocyclic Ruthenium Catalysts in Homogeneous Water Oxidation

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 68, 页码 16938-16946

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202100549

关键词

homogeneous catalysis; metallomacrocycles; renewable fuels; ruthenium catalysts; water oxidation

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [787937]
  2. Projekt DEAL
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [787937] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic activities of di- and tetranuclear Ru(bda) macrocycles in homogeneous water oxidation depend on their size, with the largest tetranuclear catalyst showing the highest efficiency. Turnover frequencies per Ru unit have increased from di- to tetranuclear macrocycles, indicating a clear structure-activity relationship for this novel class of macrocyclic water oxidation catalysts.
Two di- and tetranuclear Ru(bda) (bda: 2,2 '-bipyridine-6,6 '-dicarboxylate) macrocyclic complexes were synthesized and their catalytic activities in chemical and photochemical water oxidation investigated in a comparative manner to our previously reported trinuclear congener. Our studies have shown that the catalytic activities of this homologous series of multinuclear Ru(bda) macrocycles in homogeneous water oxidation are dependent on their size, exhibiting highest efficiencies for the largest tetranuclear catalyst. The turnover frequencies (TOFs) have increased from di- to tetranuclear macrocycles not only per catalyst molecule but more importantly also per Ru unit with TOF of 6 s(-1) to 8.7 s(-1) and 10.5 s(-1) in chemical and 0.6 s(-1) to 3.3 s(-1) and 5.8 s(-1) in photochemical water oxidation per Ru unit, respectively. Thus, for the first time, a clear structure-activity relationship could be established for this novel class of macrocyclic water oxidation catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据