4.6 Article

Influence of Confinement on Barriers for Alkoxide Formation in Acidic Zeolites

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 2451-2458

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202100009

关键词

confinement; dehydration; density functional calculations; dispersion; zeolites

资金

  1. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC (bwunicluster)
  2. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC (JUSTUS) [RV bw17D011]
  3. Helmholtz Association
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of confinement from eight different zeotypes on the formation of alkoxides from 13 primary alcohols was studied using dispersion corrected density functional theory calculations. It was found that van der Waals interactions between substrates and zeolite frameworks largely govern the variations in adsorption and transition state energies. Additionally, trends between different reactants are mainly due to the size of the molecules and can be quantitatively described by the number of atoms constituting them. Adsorbate stabilization was found to be largest for frameworks that are neither too small nor too spacious.
The influence of the confinement imposed by eight different zeotypes on the formation of the alkoxides of 13 primary alcohols is studied using dispersion corrected density functional theory calculations with the PBE-D3 functional. Adsorption energies of the alcohols are computed along with barriers for formation of the alkoxides, which is the first step of the stepwise dehydration mechanism. We find that variations in the adsorption and transition state energies are largely governed by van der Waals interactions between substrates and the zeolite framework. Trends between different reactants, on the other hand, are largely due to the size of the molecules, which can be described quantitatively by the number of atoms constituting them. We find that the stabilization of adsorbates is largest for frameworks that are neither too small, leading to repulsive interaction, nor too spacious leading only to weak interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据