4.7 Article

Using graphene networks to build SiC(rGO, Gx) bulk ceramics from polymeric precursors

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 13, 页码 18466-18476

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.170

关键词

A. precursors: organic; D. SiC; Graphene networks; C. Electrical conductivity; C. Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302237]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province [2016H6021]
  3. XMU Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Programs [201910384002, 202010384008, 202010384006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully prepared SiC(rGO, Gx) bulk polymer-derived ceramics using a unique synthesis route, exhibiting excellent performance with high electrical and thermal conductivities. The method is conducive to mass production and potential emerging uses.
Unique properties of graphene open new opportunities for preparing composites with favorable functional capabilities. Herein, an ingenious synthesis route via re-pyrolysis process of ball-milling-induced SiC(rGO, Gx)(p) fillers/polycarbosilane-vinyltriethoxysilane-graphene oxide (PCS-VTES-GO, PVG) precursors blends is proposed to obtain structural-functional integrated SiC(rGO, Gx) bulk polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs). The introduction of SiC(rGO, Gx)(p) provides favorable moldability, ceramic yield and linear shrinkage. Attractively, graphene networks with more free-moving electrical-charge carriers and wider phonon-channel prominently enhance electrical and thermal conductivities of products. Particularly, SiC(rGO, G(20%)) bulk PDCs generated at 1300 degrees C own satisfactory ceramic yield (90.74%), linear shrinkage (5.00%), fracture toughness (2.07 MPa m(1/2)), bending strength (35.37 MPa), electrical conductivity (25.72 S cm(-1)) and thermal conductivity (6.72 W m(-1).K-1), realizing outstanding values to the best of our knowledge. This fabrication method favors mass production of larger-sized PDCs and possess potential emerging uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据