4.7 Article

A combination of cross-neutralizing antibodies synergizes to prevent SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV pseudovirus infection

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 806-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.04.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1170236, INV-004923]
  2. NIH [R00 AI139445, R01 AI132317]
  3. GermanResearch Foundation
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  5. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. Coronavirus CARES Act.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a cross-neutralizing antibody, CV38-142, which can accommodate antigenic variation in SARS-related viruses, providing valuable information for addressing current and future antigenic drift in SARS-CoV-2 and protecting against zoonotic SARS-related coronaviruses.
Coronaviruses have caused several human epidemics and pandemics including the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic antibodies have already shown striking effectiveness against COVID-19. Nevertheless, concerns remain about antigenic drift in SARS-CoV-2 as well as threats from other sarbecoviruses. Cross-neutralizing antibodies to SARS-related viruses provide opportunities to address such concerns. Here, we report on crystal structures of a cross-neutralizing antibody, CV38-142, in complex with the receptor-binding domains from SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Recognition of the N343 glycosylation site and water-mediated interactions facilitate cross-reactivity of CV38-142 to SARS-related viruses, allowing the antibody to accommodate antigenic variation in these viruses. CV38-142 synergizes with other cross-neutralizing antibodies, notably COVA1-16, to enhance neutralization of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, including circulating variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351. Overall, this study provides valuable information for vaccine and therapeutic design to address current and future antigenic drift in SARS-CoV-2 and to protect against zoonotic SARS-related coronaviruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据