4.7 Article

Assessment of the interpretability of data mining for the spatial modelling of water erosion using game theory

期刊

CATENA
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105178

关键词

Spatial mapping; Erosion; Hazard map; Shapley additive explanations; Permutation feature importance measure; Catchment management

资金

  1. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Iran
  2. UKRI-BBSRC (UK Research and Innovation-Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council) [BBS/E/C/000I0330]
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0330] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study applied 15 data mining models to predict land susceptibility to water erosion hazard in the Kahorestan catchment, southern Iran, with BGAM and PLS showing the best and worst performance in predicting water erosion hazard. Game theory analysis identified factors extracted from DEM as the most important controls on predicted severity of soil erosion by water. Game theory was found to be a valuable technique for assessing the interpretability of predictive models.
This study undertook a comprehensive application of 15 data mining (DM) models, most of which have, thus far, not been commonly used in environmental sciences, to predict land susceptibility to water erosion hazard in the Kahorestan catchment, southern Iran. The DM models were BGLM, BGAM, Cforest, CITree, GAMS, LRSS, NCPQR, PLS, PLSGLM, QR, RLM, SGB, SVM, BCART and BTR. We identified 18 factors usually considered as key controls for water erosion, comprising 10 factors extracted from a digital elevation model (DEM), three indices extracted from Landsat 8 images, a sediment connectivity index (SCI) and three other intrinsic factors. Three indicators consisting of MAE, MBE, RMSE, and a Taylor diagram were applied to assess model performance and accuracy. Game theory was applied to assess the interpretability of the DM models for predicting water erosion hazard. Among the 15 predictive models, BGAM and PLS respectively returned the best and worst performance in predicting water erosion hazard in the study area. The most accurate model, BGAM predicted that 22%, 8.2%, 9.4% and 60.4% of the total area should be classified as low, moderate, high and very high susceptibility to soil erosion by water, respectively. Based on BGAM and game theory, the factors extracted from the DEM (e.g., DEM, TWI, Slope, TST, TRI, and SPI) were considered the most important ones controlling the predicted severity of soil erosion by water. We conclude that overall, game theory is a valuable technique for assessing the interpretability of predictive models because this theory through SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) and PFIM (permutation feature importance measure) addresses the important concerns regarding the interpretability of more complex DM models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据