4.7 Article

Elevation trend in bacterial functional gene diversity decouples from taxonomic diversity

期刊

CATENA
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.105099

关键词

Bacteria; Elevation; Functional diversity; Metagenome; Soil; Taxonomic diversity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, elevational patterns in functional gene diversity in bacteria were studied along a 2,300 m elevational gradient on Mt. Norikura, Japan, using metagenomic and amplicon data. Contrary to the hypothesis, a mid-elevation maximum in functional gene diversity was observed, along with a weak negative relationship between OTU diversity and functional diversity. The decoupling of functional gene diversity from taxonomic diversity emphasizes the importance of treating each as separate dimensions of diversity.
Elevational patterns in taxonomic diversity have been widely studied, but there has been little attention given to patterns in functional gene diversity. We used a metagenomic approach - along with amplicon data - to study trends in functional gene diversity in bacteria along a 2,300 m elevational gradient on Mt. Norikura, Japan. We hypothesized that in accordance with a global scale study by Bahram et al. (2018), functional gene diversity would show a mid-elevation minimum, due to a pH minimum pH and MAP maximum in the mid-elevations. Instead, we observed a mid-elevation maximum in functional gene diversity, and a decrease with increasing pH values from acidic to near neutral. We also found a weak negative relationship between OTU diversity and functional diversity. There appear to be no obvious ecological mechanisms to explain why the observed midelevation peak in functional diversity occurs. The trends observed here demonstrate that it is also necessary to consider more complex localised trends that would largely remain hidden from broad global studies. The fact that functional gene diversity in bacteria is decoupled from taxonomic diversity emphasizes that each should be treated as separate dimensions of diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据