4.7 Article

Fabrication and characterization of biodegradable KH560 crosslinked chitin hydrogels with high toughness and good biocompatibility

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117707

关键词

Chitin; Hydrogel; KH560; Biocompatibility; Biodegradability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970548, 51803153]
  2. Medical Science Advancement Program (Clinical Medicine) of Wuhan University [TFLC2018003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitin hydrogels have various advantages but weak mechanical strength, therefore, constructing chitin hydrogels with high mechanical strength and good biocompatibility is crucial. Double crosslinked chitin hydrogels prepared with specific process exhibit excellent physical properties and biocompatibility, showing promising applications in biomedicine.
Chitin hydrogels have multiple advantages of nontoxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and three-dimensional hydrophilic polymer network structure similar to the macromolecular biological tissue. However, the mechanical strength of chitin hydrogels is relatively weak. Construction of chitin hydrogels with high me-chanical strength and good biocompatibility is essential for the successful applications in biomedical field. Herein, we developed double crosslinked chitin hydrogels by dissolving chitin in KOH/urea aqueous solution with freezing-thawing process, then using KH560 as cross-linking agent and coagulating in ethanol solution at low temperature. The obtained chitin/ KH560 (CK) hydrogels displayed good transparency and toughness with compressed nanofibrous network and porous structure woven with chitin nanofibers. Moreover, the optimal CK hydrogels exhibited excellent mechanical properties (sigma(b) = 1.92 +/- 0.21 Mpa; epsilon(b) = 71 +/- 5 %), high swelling ratio, excellent blood compatibility, biocompatibility and biodegradability, which fulfill the requirements of biomedical materials and showing potential applications in biomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据