4.7 Article

Aminotriazole isomers modified cellulose microspheres for selective adsorption of U(VI): Performance and mechanism investigation

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117666

关键词

Cellulose; U(VI); Aminotriazole; Selectivity; Adsorption mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875138, 11905070]
  2. Major Technological Innovation Program of Hubei Province [2017AEA107]
  3. state administration of science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, PRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, n-aminotriazole isomers modified cellulose microspheres were prepared as adsorbents for U(VI) via radiation technology. Batch adsorption experiments showed good adsorption capacity and selectivity of n-ATARs. Furthermore, 3-ATAR and 4-ATAR were found to be more suitable for extracting U(VI) from contaminated groundwater and simulated seawater, respectively.
Aminotriazole isomers with high nitrogen content show potential affinity for U(VI). Combining the advantages of both aminotriazole and cellulose, two n-aminotriazole isomers modified cellulose microspheres (n-ATARs, n = 3, 4) were newly prepared as adsorbents via radiation technology. Batch adsorption experiments showed that n-ATARs possessed good adsorption capacity of U(VI) in the order of 3-ATAR > 4-ATAR, and the adsorption process followed the Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Both n-ATARs exhibited good selectivity and reusability. Besides, 3-ATAR and 4-ATAR were more suitable for the extraction of trace amount of U(VI) from the contaminated groundwater and the simulated seawater, respectively. The effect of amino position on triazole ring on adsorption behavior of n-ATAR was studied and explained by DFT calculation. Finally, the adsorption mechanism of U(VI) onto n-ATARs was revealed to be inner-sphere complexation via different 1:1 or 1:2 coordination models by FTIR, MS, XPS analysis and DFT calculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据