4.7 Article

Highly antifouling, biocompatible and tough double network hydrogel based on carboxybetaine-type zwitterionic polymer and alginate

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117627

关键词

DN hydrogel; Zwitterionic; Antifouling; Biocompatible; Tough

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52073256, 21404091, 21404089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LBY21E030001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study prepared a new hybrid ionic-covalent cross-linked double network hydrogel with good mechanical properties by a one-pot method, exhibiting high elastic modulus, tensile strength, self-recovery capability, outstanding antifouling property, and biocompatibility. This provides a new strategy for preparing antifouling hydrogels for different applications like tissue scaffolds, wound dressings, and implantable devices.
Because of resistance to bio-macromolecular adhesion, antifouling hydrogels have attracted great attention in biomedical field. But traditional antifouling hydrogels made by hydrophilic polymers are always poor of mechanical properties. Herein, a new hybrid ionic-covalent cross-linked double network (DN) hydrogel was prepared by a simple one-pot method based on sodium alginate and the zwitterionic material carboxybetaine acrylamide (CBAA). The DN hydrogel has good mechanical properties, including high elastic modulus (0.28 MPa), high tensile strength (0.69 MPa), as well as good self-recovery capability. More importantly, the DN hydrogel is highly resistance to the adsorption of non-specific protein, cells, bacteria and algae, exhibiting an outstanding antifouling property. The in vitro and in vivo experiments prove that the DN hydrogel is highly biocompatible. This study provides a new strategy for the preparation of antifouling DN hydrogels with good mechanical properties for different needs, such as tissue scaffolds, wound dressings, implantable devices, and other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据