4.7 Article

The tumor microenvironment shapes the molecular characteristics of exhausted CD8+ T cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 506, 期 -, 页码 55-66

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.02.013

关键词

T cell exhaustion; Tumor microenvironment factors; Inhibitory receptors; Transcriptional factors; Immunotherapy

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971466, 81972875]
  2. Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2019PT310028]
  3. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2016I2M-1-005, 2016-I2M-1-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persistent antigen stimulation in chronic infections and cancer leads to CD8(+) T cell exhaustion, characterized by increased expression of co-inhibitory receptors, loss of effector function, and dysregulated metabolic activity. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and key factors shaping exhaustion features within the tumor microenvironment could improve cancer immunotherapy efficacy targeting exhausted T cells.
The persistent antigen stimulation during chronic infections and cancer results in CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. The exhausted T (Tex) cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) are characterized by increased expression of multiple co-inhibitory receptors simultaneously, progressive loss of effector function, poor proliferation and self-renewal capacity, and dysregulated metabolic activity. Emerging insights into molecular mechanisms underlying T cell exhaustion have proposed potential approaches to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy via restoring the effector function of Tex cells. In this review, we summarize the fundamental characteristics (e.g., inhibitory receptors and transcriptional factors) regarding Tex cell differentiation and discuss in particular how those exhaustion features are acquired and shaped by key factors within the TME. Additionally, we discuss the progress and limitations of current cancer immunotherapeutic strategies targeting Tex cells in clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据