4.7 Article

Angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) interacts with cell division cycle 42 (CDC42) and enhances migration and invasion in human non-small cell lung cancer cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 502, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.11.050

关键词

AAMP; Migration; Invasion; CDC42; ARHGAP1

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672855, 31771526, 81902994]
  2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cell and Developmental Biology [SDKLACDB-2019012, SDKLACDB-2019017]
  3. Shandong Special Construction Program for Provincial Key Laboratory [SDKL2018017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AAMP, considered a pro-tumor protein, is upregulated in non-small cell lung carcinoma and promotes migration and invasion in NSCLC cells. It interacts with CDC42 to activate it, leading to the formation of cellular protrusions. AAMP enhances CDC42 activation by impairing the combination of ARHGAP1 and CDC42.
Angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) is considered a pro-tumor protein, which contributes to angiogenesis, proliferation, adhesion, and other biological activities. Although AAMP is known to facilitate the motility of breast cancer cells and smooth muscle cells by regulating ras homolog family member A (RHOA) activity, the function of AAMP in the metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells still remains unknown. In the present study, AAMP was upregulated in non-small cell lung carcinoma, and was found to promote migration and invasion in NSCLC cells. Further experiments demonstrated that AAMP interacted with cell division cycle 42 (CDC42) and promoted its activation, resulting in the formation of cellular protrusions. Subsequently, we found that AAMP enhanced CDC42 activation by impairing the combination of rho GTPase activating protein 1 (ARHGAP1) and CDC42. Taken together, we revealed and elucidated the critical role of AAMP in the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells and presented a new potential target for lung cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据