4.6 Review

Treatments for dry age-related macular degeneration: therapeutic avenues, clinical trials and future directions

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 297-304

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318452

关键词

genetics; angiogenesis; degeneration; retina; macula

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  2. Moorfields Eye Charity
  3. Retina UK
  4. Foundation Fighting Blindness (USA)
  5. Wellcome Trust [099173/Z/12/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the developed world, with promising treatment prospects for wet AMD but challenges remain for dry AMD. Various therapeutic approaches are being investigated, including drugs with antioxidative properties, complement cascade inhibitors, gene therapy, etc., with promising results from early clinical trials.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the developed world. The identification of the central role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD and the introduction of anti-VEGF agents as gold-standard treatment, have drastically changed its prognosis-something yet to be seen in dry AMD. Several therapeutic avenues with a wide variability of targets are currently being investigated in dry AMD. The approaches being investigated to reduce the rate of disease progression include, (1) drugs with antioxidative properties, (2) inhibitors of the complement cascade, (3) neuroprotective agents, (4) visual cycle inhibitors, (5) gene therapy and (6) cell-based therapies. A number of early phase clinical trials have provided promising results, with many more ongoing and anticipated in the near future. In this review, we aim to provide an update of the interventional trials to date and future prospects for the treatment of dry AMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据