4.6 Article

Reduced listener-speaker neural coupling underlies speech understanding difficulty in older adults

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 226, 期 5, 页码 1571-1584

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02271-2

关键词

Healthy aging; Neural coupling; Speech comprehension; FMRI

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 3190082, 31971036]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653248]
  3. Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning [CNLYB1803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have found that older adults have deficits in neural coupling related to speech understanding, which may be associated with their decreased ability to achieve neural alignment with others.
An increasing number of studies have highlighted the importance of listener-speaker neural coupling in successful verbal communication. Whether the brain-to-brain coupling changes with healthy aging and the possible role of this change in the speech comprehension of older adults remain unexplored. In this study, we scanned with fMRI a young and an older speaker telling real-life stories and then played the audio recordings to a group of young (N = 28, aged 19-27 year) and a group of older adults during scanning (N = 27, aged 53-75 year), respectively. The older listeners understood the speech less well than did the young listeners, and the age of the older listeners was negatively correlated with their level of speech understanding. Compared to the young listener-speaker dyads, the older dyads exhibited reduced neural couplings in both linguistic and extra-linguistic areas. Moreover, within the older group, the listener's age was negatively correlated with the overall strength of interbrain coupling, which in turn was associated with reduced speech understanding. These results reveal the deficits of older adults in achieving neural alignment with other brains, which may underlie the age-related decline in speech understanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据