4.5 Article

Neural differentiation medium for human pluripotent stem cells to model physiological glucose levels in human brain

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 141-149

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.05.016

关键词

Human pluripotent stem cells; Neural differentiation; Culture media; Glucose; Insulin

资金

  1. Melbourne Research Scholarship (MRS)
  2. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The University of Melbourne
  3. Australian Research Council
  4. Stem Cells Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new hPSC neural differentiation medium with physiological concentrations of glucose and reduced insulin levels was established in this study, supporting hPSC neural induction and formation of cortical NSPs. This revised medium may offer an improved platform for studying brain development and investigating neural differentiation signalling pathways impacted by abnormal glucose and insulin levels.
Cortical neurospheres (NSPs) derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC), have proven to be a successful platform to investigate human brain development and neuro-related diseases. Currently, many of the standard hPSC neural differentiation media, use concentrations of glucose (approximately 17.5-25 mM) and insulin (approximately 3.2 mu M) that are much greater than the physiological concentrations found in the human brain. These culture conditions make it difficult to analyse perturbations of glucose or insulin on neuronal development and differentiation. We established a new hPSC neural differentiation medium that incorporated physiological brain concentrations of glucose (2.5 mM) and significantly reduced insulin levels (0.86 mu M). This medium supported hPSC neural induction and formation of cortical NSPs. The revised hPSC neural differentiation medium, may provide an improved platform to model brain development and to investigate neural differentiation signalling pathways impacted by abnormal glucose and insulin levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据