4.6 Article

Glutamine metabolite α -ketoglutarate acts as an epigenetic co-factor to interfere with osteoclast differentiation

期刊

BONE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115836

关键词

Osteoclast; Osteoporosis; Nrf2; Slc7a11; Alpha-ketoglutarate; Epigenetics

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2016R1C1B3007534, 2016R1A5A2012284]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1C1B3007534] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that alpha-ketoglutarate negatively regulates osteoclastogenesis by controlling ROS levels and epigenetic mechanisms, with Slc7a11 playing a key role in the process.
Osteoclasts (OCs) have been well-known involved in the exacerbation of bone-related diseases. However, the role of metabolites on osteoclastogenesis has not been well characterized. Herein, we found osteoclastogenesis was negatively regulated by alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha KG) in vitro and in vivo (C57BL/6 mouse). Kinetic transcriptome analysis revealed the upregulation of solute carrier family 7 member 11 (Slc7a11), a subunit of the cysteine/ glutamate antiporter, as well as the downregulation of typical OC maker genes through alpha KG treatment. Given that Slc7a11 could control ROS level through glutathione import, we measured intracellular ROS, then RANKLinduced ROS production was inhibited by alpha KG. Notably, we highlight that alpha KG plays an epigenetic co-factor at the Slc7a11 promoter by demethylating repressive histone H3K9 methylation and simultaneously increasing the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) binding, a critical transcription factor through chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. Together, we suggested that alpha KG could be a therapeutic strategy for OC activated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据