4.5 Article

Management of peri-prosthetic joint infection and severe bone loss after total hip arthroplasty using a long-stemmed cemented custom-made articulating spacer (CUMARS)

期刊

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04237-1

关键词

Prothesis-related infections; Prothesis failure; Methylmethacrylate; Arthroplasty; Replacement; Hip; Femur; Bone loss; CUMARS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively reports the use of custom-made articulating spacers (CUMARS) utilizing long cemented femoral stems as spacers in managing peri-prosthetic infection (PJI) in severe proximal femoral bone loss scenarios. The technique provides better bone support, longer survival, mobility, maintenance of leg length, and preservation of bone and soft tissue, showing positive clinical outcomes.
BackgroundThere is little evidence on techniques for management of peri-prosthetic infection (PJI) in the context of severe proximal femoral bone loss. Custom-made articulating spacers (CUMARS) utilising cemented femoral stems as spacers was described providing better bone support and longer survival compared to conventional articulating spacers. We retrospectively report our experience managing PJI by adaptation of this technique using long cemented femoral stems where bone loss precludes use of standard stems.MethodsPatients undergoing 1st stage revision for infected primary and revision THA using a cemented long stem (>205mm) and standard all-polyethylene acetabulum between 2011 and 2018 were identified. After excluding other causes of revision (fractures or aseptic loosening), Twenty-one patients remained out of total 721 revisions. Medical records were assessed for demographics, initial microbiological and operative treatment, complications, eradication of infection and subsequent operations. 2nd stage revision was undertaken in the presence of pain or subsidence.ResultsTwenty-one patients underwent 1st stage revision with a cemented long femoral stem. Mean follow up was 3.9years (range 1.7-7.2). Infection was eradicated in 15 (71.4%) patients. Two patients (9.5%) required repeat 1st stage and subsequently cleared their infection. Three patients (14.3%) had chronic infection and are on long term suppressive antibiotics. One patient (4.8%) was lost to follow up before 2 years. Complications occurred in seven patients (33%) during or after 1st stage revision. Where infection was cleared, 2nd stage revision was undertaken in 12 patients (76.5%) at average of 9 months post 1st stage. Five (23.8%) CUMARS constructs remained in-situ at an average of 3.8years post-op (range 2.6-5.1).ConclusionsOur technique can be used in the most taxing of reconstructive scenarios allowing mobility, local antibiotic delivery, maintenance of leg length and preserves bone and soft tissue, factors not afforded by alternative spacer options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据