4.4 Article

A risk assessment tool for resumption of research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic for field trials in low resource settings

期刊

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01232-x

关键词

Risk assessment; Biosafety; Research; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [1UM1HL134590]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1131279]
  3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute U.
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1F32HL143909-01, K12HL137942]
  5. United States National Institutes of Health through the Fogarty International Center [D43TW009340]
  6. United States National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [D43TW009340]
  7. United States National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of Mental Health [D43TW009340]
  8. United States National Institutes of Health through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1F32HL143909-01, D43TW009340]
  9. United States National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [D43TW009340]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on assessing and minimizing risks associated with resuming research activities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic framework was developed to evaluate activities in different countries and implement protective measures based on the risk level. By prioritizing participant and staff safety, the framework aims to maintain research integrity and deliver on research commitments during current and potential future outbreaks.
Rationale The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 has suspended many non-COVID-19 related research activities. Where restarting research activities is permitted, investigators need to evaluate the risks and benefits of resuming data collection and adapt procedures to minimize risk. Objectives In the context of the multicountry Household Air Pollution Intervention (HAPIN) trial conducted in rural, low-resource settings, we developed a framework to assess the risk of each trial activity and to guide protective measures. Our goal is to maximize the integrity of reseach aims while minimizing infection risk based on the latest scientific understanding of the virus. Methods We drew on a combination of expert consultations, risk assessment frameworks, institutional guidance and literature to develop our framework. We then systematically graded clinical, behavioral, laboratory and field environmental health research activities in four countries for both adult and child subjects using this framework. National and local government recommendations provided the minimum safety guidelines for our work. Results Our framework assesses risk based on staff proximity to the participant, exposure time between staff and participants, and potential viral aerosolization while performing the activity. For each activity, one of four risk levels, from minimal to unacceptable, is assigned and guidance on protective measures is provided. Those activities that can potentially aerosolize the virus are deemed the highest risk. Conclusions By applying a systematic, procedure-specific approach to risk assessment for each trial activity, we were able to protect our participants and research team and to uphold our ability to deliver on the research commitments we have made to our staff, participants, local communities, and funders. This framework can be tailored to other research studies conducted in similar settings during the current pandemic, as well as potential future outbreaks with similar transmission dynamics. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov NCT02944682 on October 26. 2016 .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据