4.5 Article

Combination inhibition activity of chlorhexidine and antibiotics on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-05963-6

关键词

A; baumannii; Chlorhexidine; Antibiotics; Antiseptics; In vitro

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that the combination of chlorhexidine with antibiotics could be used to control the risk of infection with A. baumannii, showing synergistic and additive effects.
BackgroundChlorhexidine is a widely used disinfectant in clinical settings and a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. However, disinfectant resistant or non-susceptible bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, have been found. This study aimed to develop a new technique to prevent and control A. baumannii infection in the hospital setting.MethodsChlorhexidine combined with minocycline, doxycycline, meropenem, imipenem, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were tested against the 30 multidrug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates. The checkerboard test was used to calculate the fractional inhibitory concentration index according to the minimum inhibitory concentration value for chlorhexidine combined with antibiotics.ResultsThe combination of chlorhexidine with minocycline, doxycycline, meropenem, or ciprofloxacin showed synergistic responses in all clinical isolates, and more than 50% of isolates showed FICI <= 0.5. However, chlorhexidine together with imipenem or levofloxacin showed indifferent responses in 10% and 3.33% clinical isolates, respectively. In all tests, combinations of chlorhexidine with each of the above six antibiotics showed synergistic and additive effects, and inhibited the clinical isolates.ConclusionsWe concluded that, chlorhexidine combined with antibiotics could be used to control the risk of infection with A. baumannii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据