4.8 Article

Static-magnetic-field coupled with fly-ash accelerant: A powerful strategy to significantly enhance the mesophilic anaerobic-co-digestion

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 327, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124793

关键词

Anaerobic-co-digestion; Static-magnetic-field; Fly-ash accelerant; Direct interspecies electron transfer; Fertilizer utilization

资金

  1. NSFC [51672208]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502902]
  3. Key Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects of Shaanxi Province [2019KWZ03, 2019JZ20]
  4. Open foundation Project of Qinghai Building and Materials Research Co., Ltd
  5. Key Lab of Plateau Building and Ecocommunity in Qinghai [KLKF-2019-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The co-digestion of dairy-manure and aloe-peel-residue waste can be enhanced by the application of static-magnetic-field and fly-ash, leading to improved COD removal rates, cumulative biogas yields, digestate stability, and fertility for fertilizer utilization.
The anaerobic-co-digestion (AcoD) of dairy-manure (DM) and aloe-peel-residue (ALR) waste is enhanced by combining static-magnetic-field (SMF) and fly-ash (FA). Varying SMF intensities (5?30 mT) were applied to the co-digestion digesters containing the optimum FA concentration (1.5 wt.%), which were selected from codigestion systems with a varying FA (0?2 wt.%). All experimental groups exhibit the greater COD removal rates (51.56?64.19%) and cumulative biogas yields (604.14?671.64 mL/g VS) than reference group (37.77% and 433.19 mL/g VS). The digester with optimum FA concentration (1.5 wt.%) under 5 mT shows the highest biogas yield (671.64 mL/g VS), and exhibits superior digestate stability (45.4%) and fertility (7.01%) for fertilizer utilization. A powerful strategy for understanding the underlying mechanism of the SMF and FA accelerant in an enhanced AcoD system is proposed. This work documents an innovative technique for an enhanced AcoD system using the SMF coupled with FA accelerant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据