4.5 Article

Novel molecule combinations and corresponding hybrids targeting artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.127884

关键词

Antimalarial drug; Plasmodium falciparum; Artemisinin resistance; Quiescence; Drug combination; Hybrid molecule

资金

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [INMAR ANR16 CE35 0003]
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Sanofi-Institut Pasteur award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relying on the identification of relevant malaria targets in the context of artemisinin resistance, novel drug combinations and hybrids demonstrated remarkable antimalarial activity against both artemisinin-sensitive and artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites, highlighting their therapeutic potential.
Malaria is still considered as the major parasitic disease and the development of artemisinin resistance does not improve this alarming situation. Based on the recent identification of relevant malaria targets in the artemisinin resistance context, novel drug combinations were evaluated against artemisinin-sensitive and artemisininresistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Corresponding hybrid molecules were also synthesized and evaluated for comparison with combinations and individual pharmacophores (e.g. atovaquone, mefloquine or triclosan). Combinations and hybrids showed remarkable antimalarial activity (IC50 = 0.6 to 1.1 nM for the best compounds), strong selectivity, and didn't present any cross-resistance with artemisinin. Moreover, the combination triclosan + atovaquone showed high activity against artemisinin-resistant parasites at the quiescent stage but the corresponding hybrid lost this pharmacological property. This result is essential since only few molecules active against quiescent artemisinin-resistant parasites are reported. Our promising results highlight the potential of these combinations and paves the way for pharmacomodulation work on the best hybrids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据