4.7 Article

Discovery of novel pyrimidine molecules containing boronic acid as VCP/p97 Inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116114

关键词

Valine-containing protein; Ubiquitin?proteasome system; Boric acid; Biological activity; Molecular docking

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFF0218300]
  2. Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2020CG032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on designing, synthesizing, and evaluating novel p97 inhibitors, with compound 17 showing promising enzymatic and cellular activities. Compound 17 is now being developed as a candidate inhibitor, with docking studies revealing possible binding modes with p97.
Valine-containing protein (VCP) is a member of the adenosine triphosphate family involved in a variety of cellular activities. VCP/p97 is capable of maintaining protein homeostasis and mediating the degradation of misfolded polypeptides by the ubiquitin?proteasome system (UPS). In this manuscript, a series of novel p97 inhibitors with pyrimidine as core structure were designed, synthesized and biologically evaluated. Based on the enzymatic results, a detailed structure?activity relationship discussion of the synthesized compounds was carried out. Furthermore, cellular activities of the compounds with enzymatic potency of less than 200 nM were investigated by using A549 and RPMI8226 cell lines. Among the screened inhibitors, compound 17 (IC50, 54.7 nM) showed good enzymatic activity. Investigation of cellular activities with non-small cell lung cancer A549 and multiple myeloma (MM) RPMI8226 further confirmed the potency of 17 with the IC50 values of 2.80 ?M and 0.86 ?M, respectively. Compound 17 is now being developed as a candidate. Finally, docking studies were carried out to explore the possible binding mode between the active inhibitor 17 and p97.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据