4.7 Article

Synthesis of six-membered carbocyclic ring ?,?-disubstituted amino acids and arginine-rich peptides to investigate the effect of ring size on the properties of the peptide

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116111

关键词

Cell-penetrating peptide; Arginine; Unnatural amino acid; ?; ?-Disubstituted ?-Amino acid; Helical structure

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17H07269]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H07269] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The introduction of dAAs containing both natural and unnatural amino acids can enhance the cellular uptake and membrane permeability of novel CPPs. The size of the dAA ring has a significant impact on cellular uptake, while the number of carbon atoms in the side chain ring has minimal effect.
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have been attracting attention as tools for intracellular delivery of membraneimpermeant functional molecules. Among the variety of CPPs that have been developed, many are composed of both natural and unnatural amino acids. We previously synthesized ?,?-disubstituted ?-amino acids (dAAs) containing a five-membered carbocyclic ring in its side chain and revealed the utility of dAAs for the development of novel CPPs. In the present study, we designed a six-membered carbocyclic ring dAA with an amino group on the ring and introduced it into arginine (Arg)-rich peptides to further investigate the value of dAAs for developing CPPs. We also assessed the effects of the size of the dAA carbocyclic ring on cellular uptake of dAAcontaining peptides. The stability of the peptide?s secondary structure and its membrane permeability were both greater in dAA-containing peptides than in an Arg nonapeptide. However, the number of carbon atoms in the dAA side chain ring had little effect. Nevertheless, these results show the utility of cyclic dAAs in the design of novel CPPs containing unnatural amino acids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据