4.6 Article

Detection of COVID-19 in X-ray images by classification of bag of visual words using neural networks

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102750

关键词

COVID-19; Coronavirus; Bag of visual; Classifier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an approach using the bag of visual words and a neural network classifier to classify X-ray chest images into COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 with high performance. Experimental results show that extracting features with the bag of visual words leads to better classification accuracy compared to state-of-the-art techniques.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Given that this novel virus most notably affects the human respiratory system, early detection may help prevent severe lung damage, save lives, and help prevent further disease spread. Given the constraints on the healthcare facilities and staff, the role of artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis is critical. The automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 based on medical images is, however, not straightforward. Due to the novelty of the disease, available X-ray datasets are very limited. Furthermore, there is a significant similarity between COVID19 X-rays and other lung infections. In this paper, these challenges are addressed by proposing an approach consisting of a bag of visual words and a neural network classifier. The proposed method can classify X-ray chest images into non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 with high performance. Three public datasets are used to evaluate the proposed approach. Our best accuracy on the first, second, and third datasets is 96.1, 99.84, and 98 percent. Since detection of COVID-19 is important, sensitivity is used as a criterion. The proposed method's best sensitivities are 90.32, 99.65, and 91 percent on these datasets, respectively. The experimental results show that extracting features with the bag of visual words results in better classification accuracy than the state-of-the-art techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据