4.7 Article

The effect of crystallization time on structure, microstructure, and catalytic activity of zeolite-A synthesized from rice husk silica and food-grade aluminum foil

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106050

关键词

Zeolite-A; Rice husk silica; Aluminium foil pyrolysis; Bio-crude oil

资金

  1. Republic of Indonesia
  2. [857/UN26.21/PN/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that different crystallization time affects the structure and growth of synthesized zeolite-A, with 72 hours of crystallization time resulting in a sample most comparable to commercial zeolite-A.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of crystallization time on the structure, microstructure, and catalytic activity of zeolite-A synthesized from rice husk silica and food-grade aluminium foil. Three samples were prepared with fixed crystallization temperature of 100 ?C and crystallization times of 48, 72, and 96 h, followed by calcination at 550 ?C for 6 h. The samples were characterized using XRD and SEM then used in pyrolysis of mixed solid cassava residue and palm oil. The bio-crude oil (BCO) produced was analyzed using the GC-MS technique. For comparison, a commercial zeolite-A was also characterized and used as the catalyst. Characterization using XRD revealed that zeolite-A has formed at a 48 h crystallization period, with sodalite as a minor component, and crystallization time of 72 h resulted in optimum growth of the zeolite-A. The results of SEM indicated the presence of cubic crystal, most evidently in the sample synthesized with crystallization time of 72 h. This particular sample is the most comparable to a commercial zeolite-A. Pyrolysis experiments produced BCO with hydrocarbons as the main components, with relative percentages of biogasoline fraction (C6?C12) in the range of 71.88?91.47% in the samples produced using synthesized zeolite and 97.52% using commercial zeolite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据