4.6 Article

What can we teach Lymnaea and what can Lymnaea teach us?

期刊

BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 96, 期 4, 页码 1590-1602

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12716

关键词

associative learning; behaviour; brain– behaviour; complementary models; invertebrates; L; stagnalis; Mollusca; memory; neuroscience translational research; psychiatric disorders

类别

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the advantages of using freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis as a model to study the neural basis of learning and memory, exploring both what can be taught to Lymnaea and what Lymnaea can teach us. It highlights the potential of using snails as animal models for neuroscience translational research.
This review describes the advantages of adopting a molluscan complementary model, the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis, to study the neural basis of learning and memory in appetitive and avoidance classical conditioning; as well as operant conditioning of its aerial respiratory and escape behaviour. We firstly explored 'what we can teach Lymnaea' by discussing a variety of sensitive, solid, easily reproducible and simple behavioural tests that have been used to uncover the memory abilities of this model system. Answering this question will allow us to open new frontiers in neuroscience and behavioural research to enhance our understanding of how the nervous system mediates learning and memory. In fact, from a translational perspective, Lymnaea and its nervous system can help to understand the neural transformation pathways from behavioural output to sensory coding in more complex systems like the mammalian brain. Moving on to the second question: 'what can Lymnaea teach us?', it is now known that Lymnaea shares important associative learning characteristics with vertebrates, including stimulus generalization, generalization of extinction and discriminative learning, opening the possibility to use snails as animal models for neuroscience translational research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据