4.6 Review

Biocontrol ability of phenazine-producing strains for the management of fungal plant pathogens: A review

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104548

关键词

Natural phenazines; Biological control; Root diseases; Antifungal metabolites; Pseudomonas spp.

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803407, 3201101306]
  2. Nantong Applied Research Program
  3. Social and Livelihood Project of Nantong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of phenazine-producing strains for controlling fungal and oomycete plant pathogens has been reviewed, with isolated natural phenazines showing high antifungal activity. The biosynthesis of phenazines strongly influences the antifungal activity of strains, with PCA-producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis and P. fluorescens showing the highest biocontrol ability.
The potential of phenazine-producing strains for the management of fungal and oomycete plant pathogens has been reviewed for the first time. Isolated natural phenazines showed similar, or even higher, antifungal activity in comparison with commercial fungicides. The occurrence and concentration of phenazines strongly depended on the studied strains and the antifungal activity of the strains was found to be dependent on the biosynthesis of phenazines. Except for phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA), most phenazines were found in the secretions below their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and, in general, most strains showed low in vivo inhibitory activities, observing the highest biocontrol ability when using PCA-producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis and P. fluorescens. Most reports focused on the study of Pseudomonas, reducing the structural diversity, and limited the biocontrol screenings to root diseases. The conclusions achieved in this work help to understand the current state of the research field, and reveal new insights on the development of efficient biocontrol strategies using phenazine-producing strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据