4.1 Article

Enzyme kinetic parameters estimation: A tricky task?

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21522

关键词

double‐ reciprocal; K-m; Lineweaver– Burk; V-m

资金

  1. [UMA18-FEDERJA-149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses how to correctly determine the K-m and V-max of a michaelian enzyme, avoiding common pitfalls. Analysis of experimental data from biochemistry students revealed significant variations in results, but proper analysis could yield reliable estimates for the kinetic parameters.
We are living in the Big Data era, and yet we may have serious troubles when dealing with a handful of kinetic data if we are not properly instructed. The aim of this paper, related to enzyme kinetics, is to illustrate how to determine the K-m and V-max of a michaelian enzyme avoiding the pitfalls in which we often fall. To this end, we will resort to kinetic data obtained by second-year Biochemistry students during a laboratory experiment using beta-galactosidase as an enzyme model, assayed at different concentrations of its substrate. When these data were analyzed using conventional linear regression of double-reciprocal plots, the range of K-m and V-max values obtained by different students varied widely. Even worse, some students obtained negative values for the kinetic parameters. Although such a scenario could make us think of a wide inter-student variability regarding their skills to obtain reliable data, the reality was quite different: when properly analyzed (accounting for error propagation) the data obtained by all the students were good enough to allow a correct estimation of the K-m (2.8 +/- 0.3 mM) and V-max (179 +/- 27 mM/min) with a reduced intergroup standard deviation. A student-accessible discussion of the importance of weighted linear regression in biochemical sciences is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据