4.6 Article

A novel gabapentin analogue assuages neuropathic pain response in chronic sciatic nerve constriction model in rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113190

关键词

Gabapentin; Gabapentsal; Allodynia; Chronic constriction injury; Neuropathic pain; Rat

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In comparison to Gabapentin, the synthesized GABA analogue showed higher efficacy in treating neuropathic pain induced by chronic constriction injury without causing adverse motor effects.
Gabapentin (GBP) is an established drug that has been used in the management of symptoms of neuropathy but it is associated with unwanted side effects such as sedation and motor incoordination. The goal of the study was to find out a drug with greater efficacy and safety for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Our previously synthesized GABA analogue (Gabapentsal, GPS) was tested (25-100 mg/kg, i.p) in chronic constriction injury (CCI) induced nociceptive model of static allodynia, dynamic allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, mechanical hyperalgesia and cold allodynia in rats (Sprague Dawley). Open field and rotarod tests were performed to assess the impact of GPS on the motor performance of the animals. GBP (100 mg/kg, i.p) was used as a standard for comparison. GPS dose dependently reduced static (P <0.001) and dynamic allodynia (P <0.001), thermal hyperalgesia (P <0.001), mechanical hyperalgesia (P < 0.001) and cold allodynia (P < 0.001). In comparison to GBP, GPS failed to alter any significantly the motor performance of rats in both the open field and rotarod assays. These results suggest that GPS is effective in alleviating nociception in CCI neuropathic pain model but free from the side effect of motor discoordination seen in the treatment with GBP. In conclusion, GPS may prove to be a prospectively more effective and safer option in the management of neuropathic syndromes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据