4.7 Article

Revealing Gravitational Collapse in the Serpens G3-G6 Molecular Cloud Using Velocity Gradients

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 912, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abedb7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [AST 1816234]
  2. NASA [ATP AAH7546, TCAN 144AAG1967]
  3. Simons Foundation
  4. INSU/CNRS (France)
  5. MPG (Germany)
  6. IGN (Spain)
  7. [115-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the relative roles of turbulence, magnetic fields, and self-gravity in star formation, finding that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump is undergoing gravitational collapse at a certain density. The analysis shows that the magnetic field energy significantly exceeds kinetic and gravitational energy, suggesting that gravitational collapse could be successfully triggered in a supersonic and sub-Alfvenic cloud.
The relative role of turbulence, magnetic fields, and self-gravity in star formation is a subject of intensive debate. We present IRAM 30 m telescope observations of the (CO)-C-13 (1-0) emission in the Serpens G3-G6 molecular cloud and apply to the data a set of statistical methods. These include the probability density functions of column density and the velocity gradients technique. We combine our data with the Planck 353 GHz polarized dust emission observations and Hershel H-2 column density. We suggest that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump is undergoing a gravitational collapse. Our analysis reveals that the gravitational collapse happens at volume density n >= 10(3) cm(-3). We estimate the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field strength to be approximately 120 mu G using the traditional Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi method and 100 mu G using a new technique proposed in Lazarian et al (2020). We find that the Serpens G3-G6 south clump's total magnetic field energy significantly surpasses kinetic energy and gravitational energy. We conclude that the gravitational collapse could be successfully triggered in a supersonic and sub-Alfvenic cloud.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据