4.6 Article

LOFAR observations of galaxy clusters in HETDEX: Extraction and self-calibration of individual LOFAR targets

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 651, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039826

关键词

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; large-scale structure of Universe; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

资金

  1. International LOFAR Telescope (ILT) [LC2_038, LC3_008]
  2. CNRS-INSU, France
  3. Observatoire de Paris, France
  4. Universite d'Orleans, France
  5. BMBF, Germany
  6. MIWF-NRW, Germany
  7. MPG, Germany
  8. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), Ireland
  9. Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation (DBEI), Ireland
  10. NWO, Netherlands
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK
  12. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland
  13. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Italy
  14. SURF Cooperative [e-infra 180169]
  15. LOFAR e-infra group
  16. Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e.V. through the John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC) [CHTB00]
  17. STFC [ST/P000096/1]
  18. VIDI research programme - Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [639.042.729]
  19. INAF mainstream project Galaxy Clusters Science with LOFAR [1.05.01.86.05]
  20. ERC-Stg DRANOEL [714245]
  21. Italian MIUR grant FARE SMS
  22. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  23. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  24. ESA Member States
  25. NASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed the presence of diffuse radio emission in galaxy clusters, potentially associated with cosmic rays and magnetic fields. Numerous new instances of radio halos and relics were discovered in the HETDEX Spring Field, indicating a significant presence in the targeted clusters. Additionally, the integrated flux densities for the radio halos were computed to determine scaling relations for cluster mass and radio power, showing consistent results with previous works.
Diffuse cluster radio sources, in the form of radio halos and relics, reveal the presence of cosmic rays and magnetic fields in the intracluster medium (ICM). These cosmic rays are thought to be (re)accelerated through the ICM turbulence and shock waves generated by cluster merger events. Here we characterize the presence of diffuse radio emission in known galaxy clusters in the HETDEX Spring Field, covering 424 deg(2). For this, we developed a method to extract individual targets from LOFAR observations processed with the LoTSS DDF-pipeline software. This procedure enables improved calibration as well as the joint imaging and deconvolution of multiple pointings of selected targets. The calibration strategy can also be used for LOFAR low-band antenna and international-baseline observations. The fraction of Planck PSZ2 catalog clusters with any diffuse radio emission apparently associated with the ICM is 73 +/- 17%. We detect a total of ten radio halos and twelve candidate halos in the HETDEX Spring Field. Of these ten radio halos, four are new discoveries, two of which are located in PSZ2 clusters. Five clusters host radio relics, two of which are new discoveries. The fraction of radio halos in Planck PSZ2 clusters is 31 +/- 11%, or 62 +/- 15% when including the candidate radio halos. Based on these numbers, we expect that there will be at least 183 +/- 65 radio halos found in the LoTSS survey in PSZ2 clusters, in agreement with past predictions. The integrated flux densities for the radio halos were computed by fitting exponential models to the radio images. From these flux densities, we determine the cluster mass (M-500) and Compton Y parameter (Y-500) 150 MHz radio power (P-150 MHz) scaling relations for Planck PSZ2-detected radio halos. Using bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter orthogonal regression, we find slopes of 6.13 +/- 1.11 and 3.32 +/- 0.65 for the M-500-P-150 MHz and M-500-P-150 MHz relations, respectively. These values are consistent with the results of previous works.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据