4.5 Article

Fungal surface protein mediated one-pot synthesis of stable and hemocompatible gold nanoparticles

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 76-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.08.007

关键词

Nanobiosynthesis; Gold nanoparticles; Protein extraction

资金

  1. IRCSET (Ireland) [RS/2012/276]
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite their large secretome and wide applications in bioprocesses, fungi remain underexplored in metal nanoparticles (MNP) biosynthesis. Previous studies have shown that cell surface proteins of Rhizopus oryzae play a crucial role in biomineralization of Au(III) to produce gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Therefore, it is hypothesized that purified cell surface protein may produce in vitro AuNPs with narrow size distribution for biomedical and biocatalytic applications. However, different protein extraction methods might affect protein stability and the AuNP biosynthesis process. Herein, we have explored the extraction of cell surface proteins from R. oryzae using common detergents and reducing agent (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) Triton X-100, and 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT)) and their effect on the size and shape of the biosynthetic AuNPs. The surface proteins extracted with reducing agent (DTT) and non-ionic detergent (Triton X-100) produce spherical AuNPs with a mean particle size of 16 +/- 7 nm, and 19 +/- 4 nm, respectively, while the AuNPs produced by the surface protein extracted by ionic detergent (SDS) are flower-like AuNPs with broader size distribution of 43 +/- 19 nm. This synthetic approach does not require use of any harsh chemicals, multistep preparation and separation process, favouring environmental sustainability. The biosynthetic AuNPs thus formed, are stable in different physiological buffers and hemocompatible, making them suitable for biomedical applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据