4.5 Article

Laboratory and Clinical Implications of Incidental and Secondary Germline Findings During Tumor Testing

期刊

出版社

COLL AMER PATHOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0025-CP

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the clinical and laboratory considerations regarding incidental/secondary findings in clinical tumor testing and calls for the development of guidelines in this area.
Context.-Next-generation sequencing is a powerful clinical tool for cancer management but can produce incidental/secondary findings that require special consideration. Objective.-To discuss clinical and laboratory issues related to incidental or secondary germline findings in the clinical setting of tumor testing and inform future guidelines in this area. Design.-A College of American Pathologists work-group including representation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics created a review of items that should be considered when developing guidelines for incidental or secondary findings when performing clinical tumor testing. Results.-Testing recommendations should be cognizant of the differences among anticipated incidental, unanticipated incidental, and secondary findings, and whether normal tissue is also tested. In addition to defining which variants will be reported, robust recommendations must also take into account test design and validation, reimbursement, cost, infrastructure, impact on reflex testing, and maintenance of proficiency. Care providers need to consider the potential of a test to uncover incidental or secondary findings, the recommendation of upfront counseling, the need for consent, the timing of testing and counseling, and that the exact significance of a finding may not be clear. Conclusions.-As clinical oncology testing panels have become a mainstay of clinical cancer care, guidelines addressing the unique aspects of incidental and secondary findings in oncology testing are needed. This paper highlights clinical and laboratory considerations with regard to incidental/secondary findings and is a clarion call to create recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据