4.4 Article

Statherin-derived peptides as antifungal strategy against Candida albicans

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105106

关键词

Antifungal activity; Candida albicans; Stomatitis

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [106657, 400347]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/06016-1, 2016/03847-2, 2018/13904-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the effect of statherin and its naturally occurring peptides on Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm development. The peptides were found to decrease the viability and proliferation of Candida albicans, with IT-32 showing the most significant reduction in cell proliferation and biomass. These results suggest that statherin peptides have potential in reducing Candida albicans colonization and biofilm proliferation.
Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of statherin and its naturally occurring peptides (DR9-2, DR9, GE-12, IT-32, GQ-19, IP-18) on Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm development. Design: After the killing assay, a peptide pellicle was formed on the bottom of a polystyrene plate at the IC50 of each peptide. Over the peptide pellicle, Candida albicans biofilm (48 h) was grown. The peptides antimicrobial activity after the peptides treatment was evaluated by alamarBlue, total biofilm biomass and colony forming units (CFU) counting. Results: The pellicle with statherin and the peptides (DR9-2, DR9, GE-12, IP-18, GQ-19) was able to reduce he viability of Candida albicans compared to the negative control. They also decreased cell proliferation by 20 % and total biomass. IT-32 showed the highest reduction in cell proliferation and biomass, which was similar to the positive control, histatin 5. Conclusions: These results suggest that the naturally occuring peptides from statherin are able to decrease Candida albicans colonization and biofilm proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据