4.5 Article

Post-harvest fish loss in the fish value chain and the determinants: empirical evidence from Bangladesh

期刊

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 1711-1720

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-021-00711-8

关键词

Bangladesh; Fish loss; Post-harvest; Market actors; Quality loss; Food security

资金

  1. University Grants Commission Bangladesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fisheries and aquaculture sector in Bangladesh plays a crucial role in ensuring food and nutrition security for the majority of the population. However, recent studies have shown that fish farmers and market actors are facing potential income loss due to post-harvest fish loss. Factors such as education, training, better transportation, and infrastructure facilities have been identified as significant in reducing post-harvest fish loss.
The fisheries and aquaculture sector plays an important role for food and nutrition security for the majority of people in Bangladesh. Recently, however, fish farmers and market actors face potential income loss due to post-harvest fish loss. This study assesses the factors influencing post-harvest loss of four important fish species (i.e., rui, catla, tilapia and pangas) in Bangladesh. Data were collected from 200 fish farmers and 212 market actors in Mymensingh and Jashore districts. The results reveal relatively high post-harvest fish loss for fish farmers (8.10 kg per hundred) as well as for Bepari, Paikar and retailers (2.18, 2.68 and 2.61 kg per 100 kg per hundred, respectively). Poor packaging and handling practices and inefficiencies at collection points are the major factors causing fish losses. Econometric results indicate that education, training, better transportation and infrastructure facilities are the significant factors to reduce post-harvest fish loss. Raising farmers' awareness, improving infrastructure and road transportation facilities as well as effective market information flow could potentially contribute to reduce post-harvest fish losses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据