4.7 Article

Photocatalytic activation of C-Br bond on facet-dependent BiOCl with oxygen vacancies

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 548, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149243

关键词

Oxygen vacancy; C-Br bond; BiOCl; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Facet-dependent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477080, 22006100]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19B070003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the photocatalytic removal of BDE209 using facet-dependent BiOCl with oxygen vacancies, revealing a faster reaction rate on {001} BiOCl due to abundant oxygen vacancies. The hypothesis of a position-selective multi electrons reduction mechanism was proposed, providing a new perspective on halogenated aromatics activation by inducing oxygen vacancies on specific facets.
As typical persistent organic pollutants, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) have aroused high environmental concern due to their toxicity and recalcitrant degradation. Herein, the photocatalytic decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) removal performance was evaluated firstly on facet-dependent BiOCl with oxygen vacancies under irradiation (>360 nm). The results revealed that BDE209 was rapidly debrominated on {001} BiOCl with a reaction rate 4.4 times greater than that on {0 1 0} BiOCl under oxygen-free environment. Such a degradation order is completely opposite to that of Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation. This enhanced reduction is mainly attributed to the abundant oxygen vacancies on {001} facet of BiOCl, which act as adsorption sites for BDE209 to achieve C-Br bond activation efficiently. Meanwhile, debrominated products via meta -position have the highest proportion than that via orthoand para-position in the first step. Therefore, a position-selective multi electrons reduction mechanism is hypothesized. This study provides a new sight on C-X bond activation of halogenated aromatics by inducing oxygen vacancies on specific facets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据