4.7 Article

Bio-inspired synaptic functions from a transparent zinc-tin-oxide-based memristor for neuromorphic engineering

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 544, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148796

关键词

Resistive switching; Memristor; Synaptic device; Transparent memory; Neuromorphic system

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2018R1C1B5046454]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ITO/ZTO/ITO transparent resistive memory with high optical transparency was fabricated using an industrial sputtering process. The electrical properties were found suitable for neuromorphic systems, with transient pulse responses and synaptic characteristics observed. Conductivity changes were confirmed through various analyses, and pattern recognition was demonstrated using conductance values for neuromorphic engineering.
In this work, ITO/ZTO/ITO transparent resistive memory was fabricated using a fully industrialized sputtering process. We investigate how the electrical properties correspond to biological synaptic characteristics to utilize the device in neuromorphic system. The optical transmittance was over 70% for all wavelengths in the visible region. Especially, it had the highest transparency of 87.1% at 710 nm. Among the diverse electrical measurements conducted on the device, the transient pulse responses with gradual switching is suitable for use in a hardware-based neuromorphic system. The synaptic characteristics in the device include paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) as well as long- and short-term memory plasticity determined by the type of input. The iso-surface charge density, integrated charge density, and Bader charge analysis were conducted to confirm the changes in conductivity of the ITO/ZTO/ITO structure that occurred with and without oxygen vacancies. Moreover, the pattern recognition was carried out by considering the conductance values of the measured data as the synaptic part of neuromorphic engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据