4.6 Article

Twist-angle-dependent thermal conduction in single-crystalline bilayer graphene

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0045386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2192024]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11374244]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Research Funds of Renmin University of China [21XNLG26, 20XNH063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally investigates the thermal conductivity of single-crystalline bilayer graphene as a function of interlayer twist angle and temperature. The results show that a slight twist angle can lead to a significant decrease in thermal conductivity. The study reveals the sensitivity of thermal conduction to the twist angle, providing insights into thermal transport in van der Waals bilayer systems.
Thermal conductivity (kappa) of the single-crystalline bilayer graphene (BLG) is investigated experimentally as a function of the interlayer twist angle (theta) and temperature using the optothermal Raman technique. The results show that a slight 2 degrees twist angle leads to a kappa decrease in 15% at similar to 320 K. With the regulation of theta from 0 degrees to 30 degrees, the in-plane kappa of the BLG decreases first and then increases showing an asymmetry V shape. The local maximum value of kappa was reached when the twist angle is 30 degrees and the highest value was found on the Bernal stacked BLG. The obtained kappa is further found to be sensitive to the Moire periodicity but insensitive to the commensurate lattice constant of the twisted BLG. The non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation reveals that the twist angle in t-BLG affects the proportion of low-frequency phonons and finally changes the kappa. The quantitative study validates the regulation of thermal conduction through the interlayer twist angle and favors the further understanding of thermal transport in the van der Waals bilayer systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据