4.6 Article

Influence of the spin pumping induced inverse spin Hall effect on spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance measurements

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 118, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0038567

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0306004, 2017YFA0303202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11774296]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190057]
  4. Hong Kong RGC [16301518, 16301619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we introduce a method to quantitatively determine the spin pumping-induced inverse spin Hall effect (SP-ISHE) voltage using the ST-FMR signal in the Py(Ni80Fe20)/Pt bilayer. The SP-ISHE voltage is found to have an opposite sign to the symmetric component of the ST-FMR voltage. After correction, the efficiency of both damping-like and field-like torques in the Py/Pt bilayer is further estimated based on Py thickness-dependent measurements.
Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance (ST-FMR) has been widely used to determine the spin-orbit torque (SOT) efficiency in ferromagnet/heavy-metal bilayer systems. The flow of a radio frequency current through heavy-metal generates an oscillating SOT and Oersted field, resulting in the resonance of the adjacent ferromagnetic layer and subsequent dc voltage due to the rectification effect. The dynamics of the ferromagnet, however, also pumps a spin current back into the heavy-metal. Wherein, an additional contribution to the dc voltage arises from the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE). The spin pumping-induced ISHE (SP-ISHE) and ST-FMR voltages typically have identical symmetry. In this work, we develop a method to quantitatively obtain the SP-ISHE voltage from the ST-FMR signal in the Py(Ni80Fe20)/Pt bilayer. We find it has the opposite sign to the symmetric component of ST-FMR voltage. After this correction, both the damping-like and field-like-torque efficiency in the Py/Pt bilayer are further estimated through the Py-thickness-dependent measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据