4.6 Article

Excavation mechanics of the elongated female rostrum of the acorn weevil Curculio glandium (Coleoptera; Curculionidae)

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-04353-8

关键词

Beetle; Biomechanics; Buckling prevention; Cuticle; Finite element; Bending

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [MA 7400/1-1]
  2. Kiel University
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The elongated rostra of many female weevils, especially in Curculio glandium, play a crucial role in excavating channels and laying eggs. The material properties and morphology of the rostrum, including the elastic modulus and curvature, are essential factors in maximizing buckling resistance. During excavation, the rostrum needs a delicate balance between flexibility and stiffness to ensure successful operation without buckling.
Elongated rostra (snouts) are remarkable features of many female weevils. The female of Curculio glandium uses the snout to excavate channels in acorns to oviposit. Considering the slenderness of the rostrum, the excavation of channels in solid substrates without buckling is a challenging task from both engineering and biological points of view. Here we aimed to examine the roles of the material properties and morphology of the rostrum in its buckling resistance. We employed microscopy techniques, non-destructive material characterisation and finite element (FE) modelling to shed more light on the excavation mechanics of the rostrum. We found that sexual dimorphisms are present not only in the length but also in the material, particularly the elastic modulus, and morphological features, particularly the curvature and thickness of the cuticular layers. Our FE modelling showed that those factors play essential roles to maximise the buckling resistance and minimise the bending resistance of the female rostrum. Considering that during excavation, the rostrum needs to be straightened without buckling, the functionality of the rostrum is likely to be a compromise between the flexibility and stiffness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据