4.5 Article

Approximation of CIEDE2000 color closeness function using Neuro-Fuzzy networks

期刊

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 8613-8628

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02326-1

关键词

CIEDE2000; Color closeness; Color tolerance; DeltaE; CIELAB; ANFIS; Neuro-Fuzzy; Hybrid learning; Adam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper analyzes the problem of color tolerance and proposes an ANFIS-based model as an alternative. The aim of the research was to develop an alternative to the unified closeness formula that could be built on expert knowledge or adapted to fit a particular target.
The development of efficient algorithms that perform qualitative operations in the processing and segmentation of graphical images requires good knowledge on both technical and biological aspects of the vision. Due to the subjective nature of the human vision, the evaluation of color identity and closeness, that has been widely used in a variety of image processing problems, is still subjected to research and improvement. This paper analyzes the problem of color tolerance, overviewing past and existing solutions, and suggests a simple Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)-based model as an alternative to the formula-based closeness evaluation. The aim of this research was to develop an alternative to the unified closeness formula, which could be built on expert knowledge or be adapted to fit a particular target. Methods of sample selection, training approaches, and configuration of the ANFIS network were used and a comparative analysis between the ANFIS models and the neural networks was provided. Additionally, the efficiency of regular back-propagation, hybrid, and stochastic learning methods were evaluated along with a critical analysis on the widely used hybrid training method. Experiments were designed and ran on a Java-based platform-independent system, developed as part of our research, to provide flexibility in the modeling and integration for the ANFIS based tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据